-
Most referrals in therapy come from friends and relatives of the client and the therapist, i.e., persons who know them both personally. What goes on in therapy is usually perceived by clients as more connected to the therapist's personality and to the concrete interpersonal relationship between the client and the therapist, than to some therapeutic method or approach. -
Many clients respond to the scaling questions with answers between, above, or below numbers, as "I'm somewhere between three and five," "I find myself a little above six," and "It's less than a four." Therapists "creatively misunderstand" these answers as signs to see numbers as milestones along the way, i.e., useful instruments to measure progress, without sticking to them while passing by (Berg &de Shazer, 1993). -
Some clients explicitly say that they want the therapist to give them some piece of advice. These persons are often skilled advisers in their natural groups. Therefore, a useful question to them is "Imagine that a very close relative (a friend, neighbor, or colleague) of yours happens to be in your situation - what kind of advice would you give to her?" Possible interactional aspects and expected outcomes are then discussed to reconstruct the self-given advice into an experiment for a homework task. -
Most therapists use compliments very carefully and very concretely. Clients tend to meet excessive and unspecific compliments with suspicion and tension. -
It is frequently more useful to use questions as homework, than to prescribe behavioral tasks. -
Clients usually reformulate the Formula First Session Task, FFST, when it is used in its original formulation (de Shazer, 1985). Clients simplify it, and propose forms like "So, you want me to observe all the good things that happens to me and my family?" -
At the end of therapy some therapists often say things like "Please, keep me informed about how you are doing in the future. You don't need to have problems to call me. I want to know how you go on. . . ." Clients and therapists alike don't necessarily see the end of therapy as the end of their relationship.
References
Berg, I. K. and de Shazer, S., (1993), Making Numbers Talk: Language in Therapy. In S. Friedman (ed.) The New Language of Change: Constructive Collaboration in Psychotherapy, The Guilford Press, New York.de Shazer, S. (1985), Keys to Solution in Brief Therapy. New York, W.W. NortonVassiliou, G &Vassiliou, V. (1981), On Group Therapy Developments in Context: a Hellenic View,International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 34(3): 377-385
Acknowledgements
The author wants to thank Boyan Strahilov, Rossanka Gulian, Aneta Anitchkina, Nina Staikova, and many other therapists who continously look for what works best for our clients. This paper is about their shared observations.
|
Solution Focused Brief Therapy in Bulgaria
|
| By |
| Alley Vazrajdane 14 Rousse 7002, Bulgaria |
|
The Balkan
model of help-seeking and help-providing could be
called an "inwards-outwards approach." This means
that when in need of help, people's first choice is
turn to their closest relatives and friends, after
that, they turn to other relatives, friends' friends,
neighbors, colleagues, etc., until a satisfactory
solution is found. People outside the natural group
are usually not approached, mental health
practitioners included (Vassiliou and Vassiliou,
1981). When in trouble, persons search for help in
personal, face-to-face, and intimate relationships.
They remain cautious toward outsiders, and especially
institutions.
|